Week of November 4, 2013

The authors we looked at this week are both incredible people. Their presentations were fantastic, and I feel like I really learned a lot by seeing them present their work. Reading and hearing Douglas Kearney’s work has even inspired me to attempt performance poetry as a project to learn through and develop skills with.

The BathHouse event on Tuesday was a great experience. Listening to Tisa Bryant read her pieces was almost musical. The way her language comes off the page and truly creates an image is astounding and impressive. During her readings, I actually closed my eyes during her readings to allow the language the give me its story through nothing but her words. Similarly, listening to Douglas perform his poetry was an absolute treat. His emotion and expression in his tones and volumes is a wonder to experience, and even though I knew what to expect, seeing him do it live had a quality that I didn’t expect and still managed to surprise me with how powerful he is onstage.

During the Q&A, I learned a lot of really helpful things. Tisa’s advice to be able to speak aloud what you’ve written to test it in a practical and real sense is something I’ve done in the past with poetry, but for some reason never thought to do with prose. Something related to this that I believe they both said is that if something isn’t working, be willing to just let it go instead of allowing it to hold you back. Both Douglas and Tisa gave the advice of creating all at once and revising once everything is out so as to not interrupt the creative process. Douglas also gave the exercise of completely interrupting the creative process and putting self-imposed limitations on your work and seeing what great things come out of it that you can’t put down for the exercise. Really, there were a ton of great things that I learned, from seeing them, and I’ll be using many of them during my own writing practices in the future.

Week of October 14, 2013

The presentations this week were really interesting. One of my favorite parts was the discussion of the themes and concepts during Jason’s presentation, especially because he got the class involved with questions and talking directly to us. Tyler’s text had some really intriguing and unique themes, too. The all-in-one experience of the story, the title and content and ending all merging together, was something I don’t usually see in written works. It actually makes me wonder how the creation of such a piece would go — in the initial idea, the planning, the staging, etc. It seems to me like an incredibly ambitious process that, if done well, would yield a fantastic result.

My text took a bit of a different way through storytelling, though, and ended in more of a “back to square one” sort of way. The book begins talking about the relationship and the beauty of nature, then delves into a lot of politics and world events, and concludes getting back to the relationship and the nature around the three. While things happen, it doesn’t entirely feel like the story moves forward, in terms of content. It obviously does move forward through time, but the story could be told all at once with information just piling up as well and end up basically the same. The ambiguous nature of storytelling and building content through ambiance and outside forces unrelated to the three main characters was fun to read, though confusing quite often.

Week of September 30, 2013

During our discussion in class on Wednesday, a lot of good things came out about our interpretations and thoughts about Dictee. One of the biggest things, kind of to keep in mind throughout the rest of the thoughts, is that the process is the point of the writing, not the actual product — it’s the journey, not the destination. I thought that was a really interesting thing to talk about because, although I’ve heard it before many times, I just hadn’t been thinking about that while reading this specific text. Keeping that in mind during the rest of the discussion allowed for more thoughts to come about in our group.

The reference to the Greek chorus is also a really neat thing to look at, since it easily creates this idea of a narrator-like thing going on during the text to help keep it all connected even when it doesn’t seem to be. It’s also cool because of the mythological reference it makes to the muses, tying it together with the Christian themes that present themselves in the text. That, along with what seems like a connection between each muse and the content of the section that they title, makes me really interested to see how the rest of the book connects to everything else.

Final Reflection

My outreach experience has taught me many things. I’ve learned not just from what I’ve done, but what I’ve seen done as well. Ms. Glupker has been incredibly helpful to me before, during, and after my work with her class. I greatly enjoyed the work I did with her and  I’m thankful for the opportunity I had to work with her again, and I hope that I will eventually be able to even more in the future.

While I was teaching, I was also being taught. I left my outreach with knowledge about teaching, learning, and succeeding. Ms. Glupker always kept me active while I was in the classroom, which really helped me understand what it takes to teach. I was able to observe the methods of learning of students from an outside view, instead of relying on my own personal knowledge of how learning is done. She also answered any questions I had, both about working in the classroom and about various writing-related inquiries.

The most important thing I learned during my experience working in the classroom was the importance of adapting and improvising. This lesson was first acknowledged in the reflection of October 15, “During my time in the classroom, I’ve noticed that as the day goes on, Ms. Glupker will change how she structures the class slightly based on what happened in the class prior. She changes things for time and clarity, mostly. As I’ve seen this, I’ve been doing the same in helping the students with their work. I monitor myself to see what I can improve on and what I’m doing well to make sure that each class gets the best out of me that they can. I’ve been working on being faster in my interactions with the students in order to be able to get to more of them in the time available. It’s interesting that, even though I’m doing the same thing in each class, I can find different ways to do those things. It’s a very subtle, yet very important, part of being in a position of teaching to be flexible in your methods.” This has stayed in the back of my mind as I’ve continued this semester, even after I finished my work with Ms. Glupker. As a student, I have to continually adapt, and occasionally improvise, in order to get my work done. I also have to always be learning from my mistakes, reflecting on my experiences, and changing myself to achieve my goals.

The work I did directly involved the relationship between community and art/language. The community was of students and teachers learning and teaching grammar and English overall. While this would traditionally not involve the arts, I’ve learned, both from being a former student of WTMC and from volunteering there, that learning happens more productively when the students can be creative. I’ve mentioned before how students turned to and too into drawings to signify their meanings, and this is just one example of artistic creativity melding with the learning of language. The students have the opportunity to write in many different genres: poetry, fiction, non-fiction, short story, memoir, etc. Even with more structured assignments, they are given some freedom to write in a way that they are comfortable with. The freedom of creativity in the learning environment boosts the effectiveness of the lessons being taught, and I believe that is a strong example of a working relationship between the community and arts/language.

My experience in my outreach can best be described as a learning experience. To truly define my experience, I have to look at what I knew, what I didn’t know, and what I learned. I knew that working with students was something that I could do and that I was able to help people learn grammar. What I didn’t know was how the students would learn, how they would react to me, what methods would work best in that specific classroom environment, and many other things that I simply couldn’t have known. What I learned was that students learn best when what they’re doing feels like it matters, working directly with students or groups of students allows work to be done effectively and efficiently, preparation and adaption is key in successful teaching, and so many other things I wouldn’t be able to list them all. I will go back to the importance of working with students for a moment, because it’s an important part of what I learned, although less personally important than the adaption thing. The lesson learned from working with students directly, and through allowing them freedom in their work, is that in order for people to care about what they’re doing, they need to be actually involved.

With my gained knowledge from my outreach about communities, though, I don’t believe how I think about literary/artistic communities has changed. I’ve always seen the literary/artistic community as a somewhat pretentious, close-knit group actively participating in work to “better” areas or people through artistic/literary means. I don’t see myself as part of that community and I don’t actively try to be part of that community, as my artistic/literary work is done primarily for me, which does not seem to be the goal of the community as a whole. My stance on civil engagement has been altered by my outreach experience, however. I’m much more keen to the idea of civil engagement or volunteer work than I was previously, although I have done it in the past. The last time I worked with Ms. Glupker, it was a more relaxed workshop-style class and I wasn’t constantly thinking about what I was doing and what effect it had like this class has made me do. In taking a look at my actions and work, I’ve seen that volunteering is very rewarding. I’ve also learned that civil engagement is much more interesting when actually engaging.

I believe that for literary conventions such as readings, academic journals, and personal writing and reading to be more effective, they need to become more personal. My work with the community helped me focus on the fact that personalized attention helps create a better environment. For readings to take off, the audience needs to be, or at least feel, involved instead of just sitting idly as an observer. Academic journals need to be written in such a way that people can read them and understand them without needing a dictionary at hand just to get through. Solitary writing and reading needs to be emphasized and encouraged more, goals need to be given to people in order to make them feel like they’re going to accomplish something by doing it. Basically, from what I’ve learned in my community outreach, in order for things to be successful, everyone needs to be directly involved in some way.

This thought also heavily applies to the “dissemination of literary work” (which is also an example of the writing that needs to be written in a way for anyone to understand). In order to spread literature and literary practices, those you’re trying to spread it to need to want it spread to them. You can’t just spread around literary work and have people by default want to be part of it, you need to incentivize them by making them feel like what you’re trying to give them matters to their life. Make them feel like they’re part of it. If people believe that what you’re trying to share with them will affect them, they’ll be more likely to share in it with you and continue to share it with others.

This helps me to move on to my next point of creating a literary community of my own. If I were to encourage and bring to life a literary community, it would be full not of people who read and share literature, but of people who create and enjoy literature. I want a community of writers to come about, to speak their minds through the written word and have their voices be heard by those not just willing, but wanting to listen. I want the opinions of these authors to be shared and respected in the community. I want the work of each contributor to be enjoyed not because it should be, but because it can be. The literary community in my mind is one that focuses more on engaging each person than trying to spread literary work to everyone.

A literary job I might invent would be something I hope I have the opportunity to become: an author of the people. I want to write for me, but of everyone. I want to incorporate people into my work: take their requests, put them in stories, meet and engage with my readers. I want to become someone that aspiring authors can look up to, someone that will help young writers figure out what they can do to get started. I want to become an example of what can go right when you follow your dreams and let your passion carry you through the drudges of life. I want to become an author.

Bathhouse Review

Day One:
The first day of the Bathhouse events seemed to be an uneventful introduction to the authors more than an event. Each other was introduced briefly before taking the stage, then went on to introduce themselves slightly. After all previews were concluded, each author read excerpts from their pieces of work; Camille read from Sherwood Forest, Rachel read from Neighbor, and Dimitri read from Farm of Mutes. Something I noticed as a common factor between each author was a strong underlying sense of, possibly repressed, sexuality. At times the word choice created a very blatant image of sexuality, something I’d already realized about Rachel and Camille’s work from reading it, but at other times there seemed to be deliberate wording or phrasing in place intended to create vivid imagery of the scene while also poking at the possible sexuality of it. This was especially apparent to me in Dimitri’s description of the mechanism his character was dealing with. The word choice and phrasing allowed the inside of the machine to practically be felt as it was described, but the words used, I believe I recall “fleshy” and “moist,” and repeated were almost too deliberately misconstruable to be considered accidentally sexual. Even when describing the character’s relationship with his dogs, I had a feeling of intense sexual emotion and desire coming from the wording, which I found somewhat unsettling. Having not read his book, I’m unsure if the entire text is full of such things, but with both passages he read to us being in separate sections and in the character’s separate lifestyles (his work and his home), I believe that his book, along with Sherwood Forest and Neighbor, are coated in subtle and apparent sexuality.

Day Two:
The second day of the Bathhouse events consisted of each author taking time for a presentation about something each of them had prepared. Rachel presented on her organization and their website and accomplishments, Camille presented on community relations and “difficult” poetry, and Dimitri presented on why taking time to read is important. Rachel mostly showed us work that her organization had done, one example being a man walking as slowly as he possibly could through a tunnel in order to take in the surreal beauty of the scene. Camille focused a lot on the “difficulty” of being a poet in different aspects. She first compared being a poet to being an aristocrat, which to me seemed like she was saying that poets are the higher class in authorship, although I’m probably just misunderstanding her example. She spoke for a while about the “underground” factors of music and poetry — about how for something to be really groundbreaking, it has to be something no one has done or heard of before. She also touched on this “underground” having a sort of subculture to exist in. A point she made very clear, although not fully on stage, was the importance of obscurity in poetry. Her fixation with the obscurity of poetry explains very well her style of writing, but it also makes me wonder if she really gets what being a poet should be. Dimitri’s presentation focused on the importance of reading and what makes people want to read. Reading holds importance because it matters, and he spoke for a bit about what happens when fiction begins to matter. He also stated that fiction must be desirable, which I entirely agree with. People want to read something they can be interested in, and interest creates desire. He then talked about the importance of value and its place inside individuals. Basically, each person has what they think is valuable, and that interest in the value creates the desire, which makes people want to read, I think. It all seemed to be a sort of chain reaction process as he was speaking. Then he started about talking about Valve’s economy, though, and I was just really confused because it didn’t seem to segue very well from the previous topic and I was never sure where it was going.

The experience overall was interesting, although I wouldn’t necessarily say that I felt enriched or more knowledgeable afterwards. There were certainly some intriguing things said, and the presentations were pretty well done, but I left unsure of what importance it held in the world of creative writing (this mostly refers mostly to day two).

10/29/12 (4.5 hours, 9a.m.-12p.m., 2p.m.-3:30p.m.)

Event Log:
On this day in the classroom, the students worked primarily on self-editing techniques through creating examples to remember grammatical rules. Each table in each class was assigned a word set or a general grammar rule (affect/effect, its/it’s, your/you’re, there/their/they’re, apostrophes not including its/it’s, capitalization, to/too, then/than). While each group was working on their easy-to-memorize rules, Ms. Glupker and I walked around to check up on their ideas and progress and to help them with any troubles or questions they had. The students all came up with very creative ways to remember the rules, especially in the case of to/too, with one example being a drawing of the word “to” as one person in the “o” going somewhere, and a drawing of “too” with two people going somewhere, implying that the second person wanted to go “too.” We then read an excerpt of John Green’s writing as an example of great, successful writing and the students discussed their chosen examples from the text of what they considered the best parts. Each class closed with a prompt to write in the style of John Green in order to get a feel for what it’s like to write in a vivid, detailed manor.

Reflection:
What new skills will you have to hone in order to do your job well?
While walking around and talking to each group, I was very conscious of my effort to help guide the students to a correct path rather than handing them each an answer. It’s easy to just tell people how to do something when you know very well how to do it, which is something I’ve always known but have never really taken into account when thinking about teachers. Teachers have to be competent with what they teach, but they can’t fall into the habit of just knowing it and saying it, they have to know it and help the students learn it. It’s a skill itself to be able to not just know something, but to be able to allow someone else to know it as well.

10/22/12 (4.5 hours, 9a.m.-12p.m., 2p.m.-3:30p.m.)

Event Log:
The class began with writing to a prompt, which I wrote on as well. The prompt was “Your character starts receiving flowers and strange gifts. She doesn’t know who is sending them; her husband gets suspicious… the gifts begin to get stranger…” After the prompt, we followed with a lesson on the AAAWWUBBIS. The AAAWWUBBIS is a collection of words (after, although, as, when, while, until, because, before, if, since) that flag the beginning of a dependent clause. While learning about this, the students actively participated in examples by finding the AAAWWUBBISes in sentences and creating sentences of their own using each of the words. Once the lesson was sufficiently covered, the students and I competed in the “AAAWWUBBIS Olympics,” in which each student had to write 1-5 sentences in order to get the “gold.” The qualifier sentence needed to be a correctly punctuated sentence beginning with an AAAWWUBBIS, the preliminary sentence needed to use one -ing modifier and one AAAWWUBBIS, the bronze sentence needed to use two AAAWWUBBISes, the silver sentence needed to use two AAAWWUBBISes next to each other, and the gold sentence needed to use two AAAWWUBBISes and three -ing modifiers. As the students wrote, Ms. Glupker and I walked around the room to help the students and to declare any student(s) that correctly wrote all of the sentences up to gold. Nearly every student in all three classes completed the gold sentence, if not at least making it to the gold sentence.

Refection:
What does this civic engagement mean to you?
The students really seemed to enjoy the exercises in class on this day; it was very fun for them and to be there with them as they learned. It seems that as the semester has gone on, the students became more accepting of learning grammar, and they all seem much more ready to participate and gain knowledge. I don’t know if my contributions to the classroom have helped make that happen, but I do know that working with the students is helpful for them and for me. I enjoy seeing their excitement when they accomplish an assigned task just as much as they enjoy feeling that excitement. What’s being done in Ms. Glupker’s class is incredibly helpful to the students, and that’s giving them hands-on, fun examples to go along with the more boring do-it-like-this ways of grammar. This is the way students are meant to be taught — this is what learning should be.

10/15/12 (4.5 hours, 9a.m.-12p.m., 2p.m.-3:30p.m.)

Event Log:
The students worked on ACT writing methods and wrote an in-class essay. We looked at examples of ACT essays to find the strong points in them such as organization, word flow, strong transitions, and a clear thesis. For most of the class, though, the focus was on the practice essay. While the students wrote, Ms. Glupker and I walked around the class to read the students’ essays and give live feedback via sticky notes so that they could improve their writing as they wrote. We looked mostly for the points we talked about prior, specifically a clear thesis and strong transitional phrases. After the essay’s allotted time, the students had a few minutes to read over the essays and our notes to edit anything they felt needed to be edited.

Reflection:
What did you see, hear, read, or notice on-site?
During my time in the classroom, I’ve noticed that as the day goes on, Ms. Glupker will change how she structures the class slightly based on what happened in the class prior. She changes things for time and clarity, mostly. As I’ve seen this, I’ve been doing the same in helping the students with their work. I monitor myself to see what I can improve on and what I’m doing well to make sure that each class gets the best out of me that they can. I’ve been working on being faster in my interactions with the students in order to be able to get to more of them in the time available. It’s interesting that, even though I’m doing the same thing in each class, I can find different ways to do those things. It’s a very subtle, yet very important, part of being in a position of teaching to be flexible in your methods.

10/1/2012 (4.5 hours, 9a.m.-12p.m., 2p.m.-3:30p.m.)

Event Log:
We began the class with a presentation on Banned Books Week. It was an introduction to Banned Books Week, along with examples of popularly banned books and the most commonly banned books of 2011. One of the banned books, The Great Gatsby, is a book being taught in the class. The students had many questions about why different books were banned and showed interest in the idea of Banned Books Week. After the presentation, we moved on to a review on “-ing modifiers” and began work on identifying modifying phrases in popular texts. We looked at altered excerpts from a handful of popular texts and compared them to the original to observe how modifying phrases can alter the meaning of a sentence. After this, we began an activity in which each table chose an animal as a team name to compete with each other. The competition involved using four separate “-ing modifiers” to describe their animal as the most fearsome in order to “intimidate” the other teams. I helped the tables I worked with to understand the idea of the task and I contributed one modifying phrase to each. After this, we looked at longer sentences that were made longer using modifying phrases. Each table then received a sheet of paper with a sentence on it — the sentence differing between each class — and a pair of scissors. This activity’s goal was for the students to recognize modifying phrases in order to find the necessary and unnecessary parts of the sentence by cutting it up and indenting any modifying phrase, leaving only the necessary part(s) of the sentence to the left. I helped a table during each class by answering questions about modifying phrases and guiding them to be able to find the phrases on their own and understand why the phrases were unnecessary to the sentence and how they modified the necessary section or each other. After this activity, another competition was put forward between each table — a competition to see which table could write the longest sentence by using modifying phrases to lengthen it. I chose to join the competition myself and I am currently continuing to write my sentence for the next time I’m in the class.

Reflection:
Describe the audience or participants that you are serving.
This day was much more eventful than the first. I was able to work with the students multiple times during each class and get a feel for where they’re at with modifiers. The students have already begun enjoying grammar more with the help of the fun activities used to learn. The groups I worked with seemed to enjoy working with me, which makes me excited to continue working with the classes for the next few weeks or more. I’m also glad that it’s gotten me writing again, as I’ve not been writing as much as I’d like to lately.